CyberHappenings logo

Track cybersecurity events as they unfold. Sourced timelines, daily updates. Fast, privacy‑respecting. No ads, no tracking.

Toxic Flows in Agentic AI Systems Pose Significant Cybersecurity Risks

First reported
Last updated
1 unique sources, 1 articles

Summary

Hide ▲

Security researchers highlight the emerging risks of toxic flows in agentic AI systems, which involve the risky combination of untrusted input, excessive permissions, sensitive data access, and external connections. These flows can be exploited by attackers to steal data and pose significant cybersecurity threats. The nondeterministic nature of agentic AI makes it challenging to predict and mitigate these risks. Toxic flows occur when AI agents are connected to sensitive enterprise systems, such as customer databases and financial systems, increasing the risk of prompt injections, hallucinations, and other exploitable flaws in large language models (LLMs). Security professionals must implement controls to manage these risks as agentic AI becomes more integrated into business operations.

Timeline

  1. 05.09.2025 22:34 1 articles · 24d ago

    Toxic Flows in Agentic AI Systems Identified as Significant Cybersecurity Risk

    Security researchers have identified toxic flows in agentic AI systems as a significant cybersecurity risk. These flows involve the combination of untrusted input, excessive permissions, sensitive data access, and external connections, which can be exploited by attackers to steal data. The nondeterministic nature of agentic AI makes it challenging to predict and mitigate these risks. The lethal trifecta and AI Kill Chain highlight the vulnerabilities in AI agents that can be exploited by attackers. Security professionals must implement controls to manage these risks as agentic AI becomes more integrated into business operations. Toxic Flow Analysis is a framework developed by Snyk's Invariant Labs to identify and mitigate toxic flows in agentic AI systems.

    Show sources

Information Snippets

  • Agentic AI systems introduce unique risks due to their nondeterministic behavior, making it difficult to anticipate and mitigate threats.

    First reported: 05.09.2025 22:34
    1 source, 1 article
    Show sources
  • Toxic flows in agentic AI involve the combination of untrusted input, excessive permissions, sensitive data access, and external connections.

    First reported: 05.09.2025 22:34
    1 source, 1 article
    Show sources
  • Model context protocol (MCP) servers act as connectors between AI agents and sensitive enterprise systems, increasing the risk of data exfiltration.

    First reported: 05.09.2025 22:34
    1 source, 1 article
    Show sources
  • The lethal trifecta for AI agents involves access to private data, exposure to untrusted content, and the ability to communicate externally, which can be exploited by attackers.

    First reported: 05.09.2025 22:34
    1 source, 1 article
    Show sources
  • Security researcher Johan Rehberger demonstrated vulnerabilities in popular AI tools, highlighting the risks associated with the lethal trifecta and the AI Kill Chain.

    First reported: 05.09.2025 22:34
    1 source, 1 article
    Show sources
  • Toxic Flow Analysis is a framework developed by Snyk's Invariant Labs to identify and mitigate toxic flows in agentic AI systems.

    First reported: 05.09.2025 22:34
    1 source, 1 article
    Show sources

Similar Happenings

ForcedLeak Vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Exploited via AI Prompt Injection

A critical vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce, named ForcedLeak, allowed attackers to exfiltrate sensitive CRM data through indirect prompt injection. The flaw affected organizations using Salesforce Agentforce with Web-to-Lead functionality enabled. The vulnerability was discovered and reported by Noma Security on July 28, 2025. Salesforce has since patched the issue and implemented additional security measures, including regaining control of an expired domain and preventing AI agent output from being sent to untrusted domains. The exploit involved manipulating the Description field in Web-to-Lead forms to execute malicious instructions, leading to data leakage. Salesforce has enforced a Trusted URL allowlist to mitigate the risk of similar attacks in the future. The ForcedLeak vulnerability is a critical vulnerability chain with a CVSS score of 9.4, described as a cross-site scripting (XSS) play for the AI era. The exploit involves embedding a malicious prompt in a Web-to-Lead form, which the AI agent processes, leading to data leakage. The attack could potentially lead to the exfiltration of internal communications, business strategy insights, and detailed customer information. Salesforce is addressing the root cause of the vulnerability by implementing more robust layers of defense for their models and agents.

AI Governance Strategies for CISOs in Enterprise Environments

Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) are increasingly tasked with driving effective AI governance in enterprise environments. The integration of AI presents both opportunities and risks, necessitating a balanced approach that ensures security without stifling innovation. Effective AI governance requires a living system that adapts to real-world usage and aligns with organizational risk tolerance and business priorities. CISOs must understand the ground-level AI usage within their organizations, align policies with the speed of organizational adoption, and make AI governance sustainable. This involves creating AI inventories, model registries, and cross-functional committees to ensure comprehensive oversight and shared responsibility. Policies should be flexible and evolve with the organization, supported by standards and procedures that guide daily work. Sustainable governance also includes equipping employees with secure AI tools and reinforcing positive behaviors. The SANS Institute's Secure AI Blueprint outlines two pillars: Utilizing AI and Protecting AI, which are crucial for effective AI governance.